On Tuesday 01 August 2017 01:23 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Hey,
Op 01-08-17 om 08:46 schreef Mahesh Kumar:
Hi,
As per my understanding "get_existing_*_state == get_new_*_state"
It looks like you are trying to use currently available unused wrapper for
completely different purpose. But IMHO you should create a new wrapper for
get_old_state
& this should be renamed to get_new_state. :)
This really depends, and is the reason why we have to rename this.
Before commit:
get_existing_state == get_new_state
After commit:
get_existing_state == get_old_state.
yeah, right :)
Perhaps I can add both in this patch, I'll clean the series up slightly.
sounds good
-Mahesh
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
