On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:38:06AM +0300, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
> On 03/08/17 18:34, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > This approach died, we just run everything there is (and use that to
> > apply some serious darwinian pressure onto testcase to prove
> > themselves).
> > 
> > Cc: Martin Peres <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> > --
> > CI folks, pls ack.
> > 
> > Thanks, Daniel
> > ---
> >   tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist | 1859 
> > --------------------------------------
> >   1 file changed, 1859 deletions(-)
> >   delete mode 100644 tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist 
> > b/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index 17eed013f810..000000000000
> > --- a/tests/intel-ci/extended.testlist
> > +++ /dev/null
> 
> Acked-by: Tomi Sarvela <[email protected]>


And pushed, thanks, with the small drive-by addition of removing
extended.testlist also from README.


--
Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to