Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-09-04 09:35:49) > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:11:23PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > If a worker requeues itself, it may switch to a different kworker pool, > > which flush_work() considers as complete. To be strict, we then need to > > keep flushing the work until it is no longer pending. > > > > References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102456 > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com> > > Shouldn't this be a thing the workqueue subsystem exposes? Adding Tejun et > al.
The semantics are so horrible that I wouldn't suggest that the core should expose such a nasty trap. You have to be absolutely certain that your work stops requeueing itself. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
