Quoting Oscar Mateo (2017-09-27 18:37:07)
>
>
> On 09/27/2017 03:37 AM, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> >
> >> Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2017-08-23 00:27:15)
> >>> To avoid a potential hang condition with TLB invalidation
> >>> we need to enable masked bit 5 of MMIO 0xE5F0 at boot.
> >>>
> >>> Same workaround was in place for previous platforms,
> >>> but the change for CNL is more on the register offset.
> >>> But also BSpec doesn't mention the bit 15 as set on gen9
> >>> platforms and mark bit as reserved on CNL.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 4 ++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>> index d4ecb1905ad8..f31fab2651fb 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>> @@ -7024,6 +7024,7 @@ enum {
> >>>
> >>> /* GEN8 chicken */
> >>> #define HDC_CHICKEN0 _MMIO(0x7300)
> >>> +#define CNL_HDC_CHICKEN0 _MMIO(0xE5F0)
> >>> #define HDC_FORCE_CSR_NON_COHERENT_OVR_DISABLE (1<<15)
> >>> #define HDC_FENCE_DEST_SLM_DISABLE (1<<14)
> >>> #define HDC_DONOT_FETCH_MEM_WHEN_MASKED (1<<11)
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> >>> index d23f18874309..26c35ce5f240 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
> >>> @@ -1070,6 +1070,10 @@ static int cnl_init_workarounds(struct
> >>> intel_engine_cs *engine)
> >>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
> >>> int ret;
> >>>
> >>> + /* WaForceContextSaveRestoreNonCoherent:cnl */
> >>> + WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(CNL_HDC_CHICKEN0,
> >>> + HDC_FORCE_CONTEXT_SAVE_RESTORE_NON_COHERENT);
> >> This register is not sticky (i.e. does not retain its value even with a
> >> powercontext loaded). Does it even exist?
> >> -Chris
> > That is a good question. The documentation indicates it does
> > and evidence indicates that it doesn't.
> >
> > I will check when I get cnl unless someone beats me to it.
> >
> > -Mika
>
> Hmmmm... there is a "programming note" in the BSpec for CNL+ that says:
>
> "The register is write-only from LRI command. However, it is readable
> for context save."
Ugh. So gem_workarounds can't read it directly or via SRM to check we
set it. But if we dumped the context image, we could find it. The test
will just have to learn to live without it.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
