Quoting Michel Thierry (2017-10-05 20:41:40) > On 10/5/2017 12:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Michel Thierry noticed that we were applying WaDisableCtxRestoreArbitration > > even to gen9, which does not require the w/a. The rationale is that we > > need to enable MI arbitration for execlists to work, and to be safe we > > do that before every batch (in addition to every context switch into the > > batch). Since this is not clear from the single line comment suggesting > > the MI_ARB_ENABLE is solely for the w/a, add a little more detail. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com> > > It can't be clearer. Thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
Thanks for asking, and checking what I wrote made sense! -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
