Quoting Sagar Arun Kamble (2017-11-14 18:19:01) > > > On 11/14/2017 5:53 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:48:11 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -static void i915_guc_irq_handler(unsigned long data) > >> +static void intel_guc_irq_handler(unsigned long data) > > > > and verbose "guc_submission_handler()" ? > > > Yes. Should we rename irq_tasklet to submission_tasklet? > then we can s/intel_lrc_irq_handler/execlists_submission_tasklet and > s/i915_guc_irq_handler/guc_submission_tasklet. > Again trying to maintain the nomenclature consistency for Execlists and GuC.
Ok. Do that as a separate (initial) step. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
