Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-11-20 13:25:58)
> On Mon, 2017-11-20 at 12:34 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If IDLE_ACTIVE is set, then all other bits are invalid. For us, we can
> > assert that if we see a COMPLETE | PREEMPTED event, then it should be
> > impossible for it to also contain an IDLE_ACTIVE flag.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>

Applied up to this point, as we are just tidying and adding more
asserts. The next patch is the crutch.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to