Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-11-24 16:42:57)
> Keeps things consistent now that we make use of struct resource. This
> should keep us covered in case we ever get huge amounts of stolen
> memory.
>
> v2: bunch of missing conversions (Chris)
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index a05e2b92c02c..248d18a255d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void
> *data)
> dpy_count, dpy_size);
>
> seq_printf(m, "%llu [%llu] gtt total\n",
> - ggtt->base.total, ggtt->mappable_size);
> + ggtt->base.total, (u64)ggtt->mappable_size);
resource_size_t uses %pa (same as phys_addr_t), which you used below.
Did it not work with seq_printf?
-Chris
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 35d91cf07123..390de1c74329 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3354,7 +3354,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
> * a coarse sanity check.
> */
> if (ggtt->mappable_size < (64<<20) || ggtt->mappable_size >
> (512<<20)) {
> - DRM_ERROR("Unknown GMADR size (%llx)\n", ggtt->mappable_size);
> + DRM_ERROR("Unknown GMADR size (%pa)\n", &ggtt->mappable_size);
> return -ENXIO;
> }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
