Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-11-24 21:29:26) > In a later patch we introduce 'struct resource mappable', which means we > will have both mappable.end and mappable_end, both meaning different > things. Therefore to avoid any confusion prefer mappable_size for > mappable_end, since it is effectively the size of the resource.
Hmm, I still want to keep mappable_end. Would ggtt->bar work better for the struct resource of the physical address (or ggtt->gsm/gam whatever the acronym is)? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
