Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2017-11-30 09:10:27) > From: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> > > Instead of trusting that first available port is at index 0, > use accessor to hide this. This is a preparation for a > following patches where head can be at arbitrary location > in the port array. > > v2: improved commit message, elsp_ready readability (Chris) > v3: s/execlist_port_index/execlist_port (Chris) > v4: rebase to new naming > v5: fix port_next indexing > v6: adapt to preempt > v7: improved _port_next (Chris) > v8: whitespace, for loop (Chris), > find_first_unset and GEM_BUG_ON after next_port in guc submission > > Cc: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> > Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
I get add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 4/2 up/down: 380/-2 (378) function old new delta guc_submission_tasklet 1488 1660 +172 execlists_submission_tasklet 2129 2245 +116 intel_engine_dump 2234 2281 +47 execlists_cancel_port_requests 254 299 +45 intel_engine_init_cmd_parser 1134 1133 -1 capture 5700 5699 -1 Not the end of the world, just something we may be able to tweak. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
