Instead of trying to sleep for 2 evaluations intervals and then assuming
that rc6 is working, poll the rc6 residency instead.

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103929
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 tests/perf_pmu.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index e872f4e55..65bc734da 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -1008,6 +1008,20 @@ static unsigned long rc6_enable_us(void)
        return 2 * 160 * 1000;
 }
 
+static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd)
+{
+       struct timespec tv = {};
+       uint64_t start, now;
+
+       start = pmu_read_single(fd);
+       do {
+               usleep(50);
+               now = pmu_read_single(fd);
+       } while (start == now && !igt_seconds_elapsed(&tv));
+
+       return start != now;
+}
+
 static void
 test_rc6(int gem_fd)
 {
@@ -1019,7 +1033,7 @@ test_rc6(int gem_fd)
        fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY);
 
        gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
-       usleep(rc6_enable_us()); /* wait for the rc6 cycle counter to kick in */
+       igt_require(wait_for_rc6(fd));
 
        /* Go idle and check full RC6. */
        prev = pmu_read_single(fd);
-- 
2.15.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to