Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-09 12:47:04)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
>
> Check read(2) return for robustness and to silence gcc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Hmm, mildly concerned about ev.length. A long time ago when I was last
in the event queue, we guaranteed writing whole requests and nothing but
whole requests.
> ---
> lib/igt_kms.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c
> index ec3b716791a2..c8f30d2c8a54 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kms.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_kms.c
> @@ -3155,10 +3155,11 @@ int igt_display_drop_events(igt_display_t *display)
> struct drm_event ev;
> char buf[128];
>
> - read(display->drm_fd, &ev, sizeof(ev));
> + igt_assert_eq(read(display->drm_fd, &ev, sizeof(ev)),
> + sizeof(ev));
> igt_info("Dropping event type %u length %u\n", ev.type,
> ev.length);
> igt_assert(ev.length <= sizeof(buf));
> - read(display->drm_fd, buf, ev.length);
> + igt_assert_eq(read(display->drm_fd, buf, ev.length),
> ev.length);
What we do in drm_read() is
copy_to_user(buffer, e->event, e->event->length)
so this read here is too long (as its sizeof(event) + event.length). The
assert will one day blow up... But only because the code is incorrect.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
