On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, David Weinehall <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 05:04:59PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Update VBT defs to reflect revision 216. While at it, default the
>> expected child device struct size to sizeof the size rather than a
>> hardcoded value.
>> 
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
>
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c     | 8 +++++---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h | 2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> index 51108ffc28d1..b820d595ebc8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
>> @@ -1323,11 +1323,13 @@ parse_general_definitions(struct drm_i915_private 
>> *dev_priv,
>>              expected_size = LEGACY_CHILD_DEVICE_CONFIG_SIZE;
>>      } else if (bdb->version == 195) {
>>              expected_size = 37;
>> -    } else if (bdb->version <= 197) {
>> +    } else if (bdb->version <= 215) {
>>              expected_size = 38;
>> +    } else if (bdb->version <= 216) {
>> +            expected_size = 39;
>>      } else {
>> -            expected_size = 38;
>> -            BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*child) < 38);
>> +            expected_size = sizeof(*child);
>> +            BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*child) < 39);
>>              DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Expected child device config size for VBT 
>> version %u not known; assuming %u\n",
>>                               bdb->version, expected_size);
>>      }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h
>> index e3d7745a9151..bbb173e116b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_vbt_defs.h
>> @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ struct child_device_config {
>>      u16 dp_gpio_pin_num;                                    /* 195 */
>>      u8 dp_iboost_level:4;                                   /* 196 */
>>      u8 hdmi_iboost_level:4;                                 /* 196 */
>> +    u8 dp_max_link_rate_reserved:6;                         /* 216 */
>> +    u8 dp_max_link_rate:2;                                  /* 216 CNL+ */
>
> Isn't the bitorder wrong here?

*facepalm*

>
>>  } __packed;
>>  
>>  struct bdb_general_definitions {
>> -- 
>> 2.11.0
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to