On 2018-01-20 11:40 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Along this vein, it's worthwhile pointing out that the current scheduler > is not even close to being the cgroup-enabled CFS implementation it > needs to be to call itself a scheduler. (It's more or less a no-op > scheduler.) It may be premature to start exposing hooks into it.
Sounds like it may not be too late to abandon the separate i915 scheduler in favour of the common one used by amdgpu and etnaviv? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
