On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:49:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > Comment says that this applies to earlier gens, too. Since two more > MI_NOOP's can't hurt that much, I've figured I'll apply this w/a down > to gen2. > > v2: Correct the ringbuffer dword count for gen3, spotted by Chris > Wilson. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
I'm just not sold on this one, surely we would have spotted a need before now? 12 extra cycles after every batch! :-p Can you please fix up the cut'n'paste comments to not refer to generations that never call the function? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
