Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-02-07 22:34:00)
> On 2/7/2018 1:05 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If we remove some hardcoded assumptions about the preempt context having
> > a fixed id, reserved from use by normal user contexts, we may only
> > allocate the i915_gem_context when required. Then the subsequent
> > decisions on using preemption reduce to having the preempt context
> > available.
> > 
> > v2: Include an assert that we don't allocate the preempt context twice.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
> 
> Only this one was missing a r-b, but all 3:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>

Pushed, thanks. Hopefully this makes the icl bifurcation tidier.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to