Quoting Ville Syrjala (2018-02-21 16:02:30)
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
>
> Gen2/3 display engine depends on the fence for tiled scanout. So if we
> fail to get a fence fail the entire operation.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 5d46771d58f6..66b269bc24b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -2123,6 +2123,8 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> goto err;
>
> if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> /* Install a fence for tiled scan-out. Pre-i965 always needs a
> * fence, whereas 965+ only requires a fence if using
> * framebuffer compression. For simplicity, we always, when
> @@ -2139,7 +2141,13 @@ intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
> * something and try to run the system in a "less than
> optimal"
> * mode that matches the user configuration.
> */
> - if (i915_vma_pin_fence(vma) == 0 && vma->fence)
> + ret = i915_vma_pin_fence(vma);
> + if (ret != 0 && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 4) {
> + vma = ERR_PTR(ret);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret == 0 && vma->fence)
> *out_flags |= PLANE_HAS_FENCE;
> }
Ok, I'd like to see INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 4 be replaced with say
needs_fence (and may be passed in from the caller like wants_fence?).
Then I'm wondering if a
if (WARN_ON(needs_fence && !(*flags & PLANE_HAS_FENCE))
makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
