On 2/27/2018 6:22 PM, Michał Winiarski wrote:
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>

To allow future code reuse. While here, fix comment style.

Suggested-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiar...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kam...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c  | 33 ++-------------------------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h |  1 +
  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 0a7ed990a8d1..023ba897e991 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1759,37 +1759,8 @@ static void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv, u32 pm_iir)
static void gen9_guc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 gt_iir)
  {
-       if (gt_iir & GEN9_GUC_TO_HOST_INT_EVENT) {
-               /* Sample the log buffer flush related bits & clear them out now
-                * itself from the message identity register to minimize the
-                * probability of losing a flush interrupt, when there are back
-                * to back flush interrupts.
-                * There can be a new flush interrupt, for different log buffer
-                * type (like for ISR), whilst Host is handling one (for DPC).
-                * Since same bit is used in message register for ISR & DPC, it
-                * could happen that GuC sets the bit for 2nd interrupt but Host
-                * clears out the bit on handling the 1st interrupt.
-                */
-               u32 msg, flush;
-
-               msg = I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15));
-               flush = msg & (INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED |
-                              INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER);
-               if (flush) {
-                       /* Clear the message bits that are handled */
-                       I915_WRITE(SOFT_SCRATCH(15), msg & ~flush);
-
-                       /* Handle flush interrupt in bottom half */
-                       queue_work(dev_priv->guc.log.runtime.flush_wq,
-                                  &dev_priv->guc.log.runtime.flush_work);
-
-                       dev_priv->guc.log.flush_interrupt_count++;
-               } else {
-                       /* Not clearing of unhandled event bits won't result in
-                        * re-triggering of the interrupt.
-                        */
-               }
-       }
+       if (gt_iir & GEN9_GUC_TO_HOST_INT_EVENT)
+               intel_guc_notification_handler(&dev_priv->guc);
There is GUC_NOTIFICATION_EVENT (which seems to be unused though) event whose name matches with proposed function name to some extent. I think  we should change the name to "intel_guc_g2h_int_handler" or some other. Other events too are kind of notification to host.
Otherwise change looks good.
  }
static void i9xx_pipestat_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
index 21140ccd7a97..f622dd6009b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c
@@ -364,6 +364,43 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 
*action, u32 len)
        return ret;
  }
+void intel_guc_notification_handler(struct intel_guc *guc)
+{
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
+       u32 msg, flush;
+
+       /*
+        * Sample the log buffer flush related bits & clear them out now
+        * itself from the message identity register to minimize the
+        * probability of losing a flush interrupt, when there are back
+        * to back flush interrupts.
+        * There can be a new flush interrupt, for different log buffer
+        * type (like for ISR), whilst Host is handling one (for DPC).
+        * Since same bit is used in message register for ISR & DPC, it
+        * could happen that GuC sets the bit for 2nd interrupt but Host
+        * clears out the bit on handling the 1st interrupt.
+        */
+
+       msg = I915_READ(SOFT_SCRATCH(15));
+       flush = msg & (INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED |
+                      INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER);
+       if (flush) {
+               /* Clear the message bits that are handled */
+               I915_WRITE(SOFT_SCRATCH(15), msg & ~flush);
+
+               /* Handle flush interrupt in bottom half */
+               queue_work(guc->log.runtime.flush_wq,
+                          &guc->log.runtime.flush_work);
+
+               guc->log.flush_interrupt_count++;
+       } else {
+               /*
+                * Not clearing of unhandled event bits won't result in
+                * re-triggering of the interrupt.
+                */
+       }
+}
+
  int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc)
  {
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 52856a97477d..5b905bae181d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ int intel_guc_init(struct intel_guc *guc);
  void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc);
  int intel_guc_send_nop(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len);
  int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len);
+void intel_guc_notification_handler(struct intel_guc *guc);
  int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc);
  int intel_guc_auth_huc(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 rsa_offset);
  int intel_guc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);

--
Thanks,
Sagar

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to