Quoting Michel Thierry (2018-04-24 23:27:41)
> On 4/24/2018 2:39 PM, Oscar Mateo wrote:
> > Interrupt handling in Gen11 is quite different from previous platforms.
> >
> > v2: Rebased (Michel)
> > v3: Rebased with wiggle
> > v4: Rebased, remove TODO warning correctly (Daniele)
> > v5: Rebased, made gen11_gtiir const while at it (Michel)
> > v6: Rebased
> > v7: Adapt to the style currently in upstream
> >
> > Suggested-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 ++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 60
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 96547e0..f9bc3aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ void i915_hotplug_interrupt_update(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > gen11_gt_engine_identity(struct drm_i915_private * const i915,
> > const unsigned int bank, const unsigned int bit);
> >
> > -static bool gen11_reset_one_iir(struct drm_i915_private * const i915,
> > - const unsigned int bank,
> > - const unsigned int bit)
> > +bool gen11_reset_one_iir(struct drm_i915_private * const i915,
> > + const unsigned int bank,
> > + const unsigned int bit)
> > {
> > void __iomem * const regs = i915->regs;
> > u32 dw;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > index 58868b9..9bba035 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> > @@ -1333,6 +1333,9 @@ void intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > void intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> >
> > /* i915_irq.c */
> > +bool gen11_reset_one_iir(struct drm_i915_private * const i915,
> > + const unsigned int bank,
> > + const unsigned int bit);
> > void gen5_enable_gt_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t mask);
> > void gen5_disable_gt_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t
> > mask);
> > void gen6_mask_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 mask);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > index 2d6572a..7ea5f36 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -789,22 +789,9 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs
> > *engine)
> >
> > static void clear_gtiir(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > {
> > - static const u8 gtiir[] = {
> > - [RCS] = 0,
> > - [BCS] = 0,
> > - [VCS] = 1,
> > - [VCS2] = 1,
> > - [VECS] = 3,
> > - };
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = engine->i915;
> > int i;
> >
> > - /* TODO: correctly reset irqs for gen11 */
> > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 11))
> > - return;
> > -
> > - GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(gtiir));
> > -
> > /*
> > * Clear any pending interrupt state.
> > *
> > @@ -812,13 +799,50 @@ static void clear_gtiir(struct intel_engine_cs
> > *engine)
> > * double buffered, and so if we only reset it once there may
> > * still be an interrupt pending.
> > */
> > - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> > - I915_WRITE(GEN8_GT_IIR(gtiir[engine->id]),
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11) {
> > + static const struct {
> > + u8 bank;
> > + u8 bit;
> > + } gen11_gtiir[] = {
> > + [RCS] = {0, GEN11_RCS0},
> > + [BCS] = {0, GEN11_BCS},
> > + [_VCS(0)] = {1, GEN11_VCS(0)},
> > + [_VCS(1)] = {1, GEN11_VCS(1)},
> > + [_VCS(2)] = {1, GEN11_VCS(2)},
> > + [_VCS(3)] = {1, GEN11_VCS(3)},
> > + [_VECS(0)] = {1, GEN11_VECS(0)},
> > + [_VECS(1)] = {1, GEN11_VECS(1)},
> > + };
> bit,bank values are correct so
>
> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thie...@intel.com>
>
> > + unsigned long irqflags;
> > +
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(engine->id >= ARRAY_SIZE(gen11_gtiir));
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
> > + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> > + gen11_reset_one_iir(dev_priv,
> > + gen11_gtiir[engine->id].bank,
> > + gen11_gtiir[engine->id].bit);
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
Strictly speaking we are already inside an irq-safe section.
Applied as is.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
