Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-24 16:04:47) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > In the string tracepoint representation we ended up with the engine > sandwiched between context hardware id and context fence id. > > Move the two pieces of context data together and consolidate for > redability using the format of ctx=hw_id:fence_context_id.
Grr, bring backs my memory of ctx being the most important! In order of segregation, I think of it as device+context as being the outer container (a user isn't meant to escape their context). The timelines and engines they use are all contained within their context. But what we call ctx here isn't really context, but timeline; how about if we switch to the fence=%llx:%d representation we've mostly settled on for the debug messages? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
