Quoting Patchwork (2018-06-07 15:12:34) > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [01/20] drm/i915: Apply batch location > restrictions before pinning > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44393/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4289_full -> Patchwork_9227_full = > > == Summary - FAILURE == > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9227_full absolutely need to > be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_9227_full, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
The big change here that wasn't previous reported is: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9227/pig-hsw-4770r/run0.log No new failures. On previous runs there were GPU hangs. \o/ > == Possible new issues == > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_9227_full: > > === IGT changes === > > ==== Possible regressions ==== > > igt@drv_selftest@live_hangcheck: > shard-hsw: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL Still no better. Expected, but still disappointing. > igt@gem_exec_await@wide-all: > shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900) > shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900) > shard-apl: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900) > shard-kbl: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105900) Hmm, looks I need to fix this igt (I probably said has_full_ppgtt in calculating the number of requests/contexts I can use instead of has_execlists). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
