guc also uses timer-based sampling and cannot reliably hit our accuracy requirements for the test, so skip.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> --- tests/perf_pmu.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c index 4570f926d..61e83bf7b 100644 --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c @@ -1507,6 +1507,17 @@ static void __rearm_spin_batch(igt_spin_t *spin) #define assert_within(x, ref, tolerance) \ __assert_within(x, ref, tolerance, tolerance) +static bool uses_timer_sampling(int gem_fd) +{ + if (!gem_has_execlists(gem_fd)) + return true; + + if (gem_has_guc_submission(gem_fd)) + return true; + + return false; +} + static void accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, unsigned long target_busy_pct) @@ -1524,7 +1535,7 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, int fd; /* Sampling platforms cannot reach the high accuracy criteria. */ - igt_require(gem_has_execlists(gem_fd)); + igt_require(!uses_timer_sampling(gem_fd)); while (idle_us < 2500) { busy_us *= 2; -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
