On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 23:10 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 12:48:28PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 07:54:22PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan
> > wrote:
> > > A crtc modeset lock was added for link retraining but
> > > intel_dp_retrain_link() knows to take the necessary locks since
> > > commit c85d200e8321 ("drm/i915: Move SST DP link retraining into
> > > the
> > > ->post_hotplug() hook")
> > > v2: Drop AUX power domain reference in the early return path
> > > 
> > > Fixes: c85d200e8321 ("drm/i915: Move SST DP link retraining into
> > > the ->post_hotplug() hook")
> > 
> > This patch failed on cherry-pick for drm-intel-fixes targeting
> > 4.19.
> > 
> > If it still makes sense to have it there please provide a
> > backported version
> > to drm-intel-fixes or let me know if it has dependency on other
> > patches?
> 
> This is more of an optimization to not disturb page flips and whatnot
> so much with detect. The double lock is otherwise harmless due to
> ww_mutex.
> 
Yeah, let's not backport this.

-DK

> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rodrigo.
> > 
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <[email protected]
> > > >
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > index 09229fc66dec..ef28cc0f122c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -5079,8 +5079,15 @@ intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector
> > > *connector,
> > >    * Some external monitors do not signal loss of link
> > > synchronization
> > >    * with an IRQ_HPD, so force a link status check.
> > >    */
> > > - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> > > -         intel_dp_retrain_link(encoder, ctx);
> > > + if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> > > +         int ret;
> > > +
> > > +         ret = intel_dp_retrain_link(encoder, ctx);
> > > +         if (ret) {
> > > +                 intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, intel_dp-
> > > >aux_power_domain);
> > > +                 return ret;
> > > +         }
> > > + }
> > >  
> > >   /*
> > >    * Clearing NACK and defer counts to get their exact values
> > > @@ -5130,19 +5137,8 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector
> > > *connector,
> > >                 connector->base.id, connector->name);
> > >  
> > >   /* If full detect is not performed yet, do a full detect */
> > > - if (!intel_dp->detect_done) {
> > > -         struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > > -         int ret;
> > > -
> > > -         crtc = connector->state->crtc;
> > > -         if (crtc) {
> > > -                 ret = drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, ctx);
> > > -                 if (ret)
> > > -                         return ret;
> > > -         }
> > > -
> > > + if (!intel_dp->detect_done)
> > >           status = intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp-
> > > >attached_connector, ctx);
> > > - }
> > >  
> > >   intel_dp->detect_done = false;
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.14.1
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to