On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:01:32PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> With this one here we can finally drop the intel state structures from
> the functions that compute watermark values: they all rely on struct
> skl_wm_params now. This should help the watermarks code be a little
> more clear on its intent and also match the spec a little bit more
> with the carefully chosen names for its parameters.

I guess we'll just roll with the duplication.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 20 ++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index b32d680d9bf0..4712eaea9744 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ struct skl_wm_params {
>       bool x_tiled, y_tiled;
>       bool rc_surface;
>       bool is_planar;
> +     uint32_t pipe_htotal;
>       uint32_t width;
>       uint16_t ddb_blocks;
>       uint8_t cpp;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index d101c542f10d..b01f3d807ff6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4549,6 +4549,8 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>                        fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED_CCS;
>       wp->is_planar = fb->format->format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12;
>  
> +     wp->pipe_htotal = cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal;
> +
>       if (plane->id == PLANE_CURSOR) {
>               wp->width = intel_pstate->base.crtc_w;
>       } else {
> @@ -4630,7 +4632,6 @@ skl_compute_plane_wm_params(const struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  }
>  
>  static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -                             struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>                               int level,
>                               const struct skl_wm_params *wp,
>                               const struct skl_wm_level *result_prev,
> @@ -4659,17 +4660,15 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>       method1 = skl_wm_method1(dev_priv, wp->plane_pixel_rate,
>                                wp->cpp, latency, wp->dbuf_block_size);
> -     method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate,
> -                              cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal,
> +     method2 = skl_wm_method2(wp->plane_pixel_rate, wp->pipe_htotal,
>                                latency,
>                                wp->plane_blocks_per_line);
>  
>       if (wp->y_tiled) {
>               selected_result = max_fixed16(method2, wp->y_tile_minimum);
>       } else {
> -             if ((wp->cpp * cstate->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal /
> -                  wp->dbuf_block_size < 1) &&
> -                  (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1)) {
> +             if ((wp->cpp * wp->pipe_htotal / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1) &&
> +                 (wp->plane_bytes_per_line / wp->dbuf_block_size < 1)) {
>                       selected_result = method2;
>               } else if (wp->ddb_blocks >=
>                        fixed16_to_u32_round_up(wp->plane_blocks_per_line)) {
> @@ -4782,7 +4781,6 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  
>  static int
>  skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> -                   struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>                     const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,
>                     struct skl_plane_wm *wm,
>                     int plane_id)
> @@ -4802,7 +4800,6 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>                       result_prev = plane_id ? &wm->uv_wm[0] : &wm->wm[0];
>  
>               ret = skl_compute_plane_wm(dev_priv,
> -                                        cstate,
>                                          level,
>                                          wm_params,
>                                          result_prev,
> @@ -4937,8 +4934,7 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state 
> *cstate,
>               if (!wm_params.plane_visible)
>                       continue;
>  
> -             ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate, &wm_params, wm,
> -                                         0);
> +             ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, &wm_params, wm, 0);
>               if (ret) {
>                       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute 
> watermark levels\n",
>                                     plane->base.id, plane->name);
> @@ -4956,8 +4952,8 @@ static int skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state 
> *cstate,
>                       if (ret)
>                               return ret;
>  
> -                     ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, cstate,
> -                                                 &wm_params, wm, 1);
> +                     ret = skl_compute_wm_levels(dev_priv, &wm_params, wm,
> +                                                 1);
>                       if (ret) {
>                               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] failed to compute 
> planar watermark levels\n",
>                                             plane->base.id, plane->name);
> -- 
> 2.14.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to