Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:02:57AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: >> When adding the fb idle detection to mark-inactive, it was forgotten >> that userspace can drive the processing of retire-requests. We assumed >> that it would be principally driven by the retire requests worker, >> running once every second whilst active and so we would get the deferred >> timer for free. Instead we spend too many CPU cycles reclocking the LVDS >> preventing real work from being done. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> >> Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander Lam <[email protected]> >> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58843 >> Cc: [email protected] > > Poke. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
