Chris Wilson <[email protected]> writes: > This pair, gem_exec_nop/{series,parallel}, are very light stress tests > of which we already perform the same sequence inside > i915_selftests/live_requests. We keep basic uABI coverage (i.e. plain > old gem_execbuf) via the likes of gem_exec_basic and gem_exec_reloc so > all gem_exec_nop adds are nefarious HW details, much less likely to spot > if a test is of sound quality for further testing (and again, we have > alternate coverage of the same HW stress). > > Between the pair of subtests, gem_exec_nop takes about 20s of BAT. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> > Cc: Petri Latvala <[email protected]> > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <[email protected]>
I was going to say that I have already stamped this. But re-checking the previous submission, I haven't. Perhaps I forgot to press send. Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]> > --- > tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > index da3c4c8ed..a95d2e95c 100644 > --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > @@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait-default > igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await-default > igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await-default > igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic > -igt@gem_exec_nop@basic-parallel > -igt@gem_exec_nop@basic-series > igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic > igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-allowed > igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-rejected > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
