This pair, gem_exec_nop/{series,parallel}, are very light stress tests
of which we already perform the same sequence inside
i915_selftests/live_requests. We keep basic uABI coverage (i.e. plain
old gem_execbuf) via the likes of gem_exec_basic and gem_exec_reloc so
all gem_exec_nop adds are nefarious HW details, much less likely to spot
if a test is of sound quality for further testing (and again, we have
alternate coverage of the same HW stress).

Between the pair of subtests, gem_exec_nop takes about 20s of BAT.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
Cc: Petri Latvala <[email protected]>
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <[email protected]>
---
 tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist 
b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
index da3c4c8ed..a95d2e95c 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
@@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-wait-default
 igt@gem_exec_fence@basic-await-default
 igt@gem_exec_fence@nb-await-default
 igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic
-igt@gem_exec_nop@basic-parallel
-igt@gem_exec_nop@basic-series
 igt@gem_exec_parallel@basic
 igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-allowed
 igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-rejected
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to