As we recompute the remaining timeout after waiting, there is a
potential for that timeout to be less than zero and so need sanitizing.
The timeout is always returned to userspace and validated, so we should
always perform the sanitation.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 63c05dd..fcf8492 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1045,6 +1045,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, 
u32 seqno,
        if (timeout) {
                struct timespec sleep_time = timespec_sub(now, before);
                *timeout = timespec_sub(*timeout, sleep_time);
+               set_normalized_timespec(timeout, 0, 0);
        }
 
        switch (end) {
@@ -1053,8 +1054,6 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, 
u32 seqno,
        case -ERESTARTSYS: /* Signal */
                return (int)end;
        case 0: /* Timeout */
-               if (timeout)
-                       set_normalized_timespec(timeout, 0, 0);
                return -ETIME;
        default: /* Completed */
                WARN_ON(end < 0); /* We're not aware of other errors */
-- 
1.7.10.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to