On Tue, 09 Apr 2013, Egbert Eich <e...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
> From: Egbert Eich <e...@suse.de>
>
> This way it is possible to limit 're'-detect() of displays to connectors
> which have received an HPD event.

I'd like you to be more explicit that this patch doesn't in fact add
such stuff in itself.

>
> v2: Reordered drm_i915_private: Move hpd_event_bits to hpd state tracking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Egbert Eich <e...@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index a3ed2e3..907e290 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
>                       HPD_MARK_DISABLED = 2
>               } hpd_mark;
>       } hpd_stats[HPD_NUM_PINS];
> +     u32 hpd_event_bits;
>  #define I915_REENABLE_HOTPLUG_DELAY (2*60*1000)
>       struct timer_list hotplug_reenable_timer;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 1a00533..92041b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ static void i915_hotplug_work_func(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>       struct drm_connector *connector;
>       unsigned long irqflags;
>       bool connector_disabled = false;
> +     u32 hpd_event_bits;
>  
>       /* HPD irq before everything is fully set up. */
>       if (!dev_priv->enable_hotplug_processing)
> @@ -357,6 +358,9 @@ static void i915_hotplug_work_func(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("running encoder hotplug functions\n");
>  
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
> +
> +     hpd_event_bits = dev_priv->hpd_event_bits;
> +     dev_priv->hpd_event_bits = 0;
>       list_for_each_entry(connector, &mode_config->connector_list, head) {
>               intel_connector = to_intel_connector(connector);
>               intel_encoder = intel_connector->encoder;
> @@ -370,6 +374,10 @@ static void i915_hotplug_work_func(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>                               | DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT;
>                       connector_disabled = true;
>               }
> +             if (hpd_event_bits & (1 << intel_encoder->hpd_pin)) {
> +                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Connector %s (pin %i) received hotplug 
> event.\n",
> +                                   drm_get_connector_name(connector), 
> intel_encoder->hpd_pin);
> +             }

I fear this may end up being a bit excessive debug printing.

BR,
Jani.

>       }
>       if (connector_disabled) {
>               drm_kms_helper_poll_enable(dev); /* if there were no outputs to 
> poll, poll is disabled */
> @@ -626,6 +634,7 @@ static inline bool hotplug_irq_storm_detect(struct 
> drm_device *dev,
>       for (i = 1; i < HPD_NUM_PINS; i++) {
>               if ((hpd[i] & hotplug_trigger) &&
>                   dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_mark == HPD_ENABLED) {
> +                     dev_priv->hpd_event_bits |= (1 << i);
>                       if (!time_in_range(jiffies, 
> dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_last_jiffies,
>                                         
> dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_last_jiffies
>                                         + 
> msecs_to_jiffies(HPD_STORM_DETECT_PERIOD))) {
> @@ -633,6 +642,7 @@ static inline bool hotplug_irq_storm_detect(struct 
> drm_device *dev,
>                               dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_cnt = 0;
>                       } else if (dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_cnt > 5) {
>                               dev_priv->hpd_stats[i].hpd_mark = 
> HPD_MARK_DISABLED;
> +                             dev_priv->hpd_event_bits &= ~(1 << i);
>                               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("HPD interrupt storm detected on  
> PIN %d\n", i);
>                               ret = true;
>                       } else
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to