When testing whether we prevent suppressing preemption, it helps to
avoid a time slice expiring prematurely.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111108
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index 91f1c9012489..b797be1627e9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -913,6 +913,8 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg)
                        goto err_wedged;
                }
 
+               /* Keep postponing the timer to avoid premature slicing */
+               mod_timer(&engine->execlists.timer, jiffies + HZ);
                for (depth = 0; depth < 8; depth++) {
                        rq_b = spinner_create_request(&b.spin,
                                                      b.ctx, engine,
@@ -938,7 +940,8 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg)
                igt_spinner_end(&a.spin);
 
                if (engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count) {
-                       pr_err("Preemption recorded x%d, depth %d; should have 
been suppressed!\n",
+                       pr_err("Preemption on %s recorded x%d, depth %d; should 
have been suppressed!\n",
+                              engine->name,
                               engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count,
                               depth);
                        err = -EINVAL;
-- 
2.23.0.rc1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to