Having decided that we only care about the promotion predicate, we can
simplify gen12_csb_parse to simply check whether we need to jump to a
new queue.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index af79b8d70800..60a789d632d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1896,9 +1896,6 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists 
*execlists, const u32 *csb)
        bool ctx_away_valid = GEN12_CSB_CTX_VALID(upper_dw);
        bool new_queue = lower_dw & GEN12_CTX_STATUS_SWITCHED_TO_NEW_QUEUE;
 
-       if (!ctx_away_valid && ctx_to_valid)
-               return true;
-
        /*
         * The context switch detail is not guaranteed to be 5 when a preemption
         * occurs, so we can't just check for that. The check below works for
@@ -1906,8 +1903,10 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists 
*execlists, const u32 *csb)
         * instructions and lite-restore. Preempt-to-idle via the CTRL register
         * would require some extra handling, but we don't support that.
         */
-       if (new_queue && ctx_away_valid)
+       if (!ctx_away_valid || new_queue) {
+               GEM_BUG_ON(!ctx_to_valid);
                return true;
+       }
 
        /*
         * switch detail = 5 is covered by the case above and we do not expect a
@@ -1915,7 +1914,6 @@ gen12_csb_parse(const struct intel_engine_execlists 
*execlists, const u32 *csb)
         * use polling mode.
         */
        GEM_BUG_ON(GEN12_CTX_SWITCH_DETAIL(upper_dw));
-
        return false;
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to