We set out-of-bound parameters inside the i915_requests.flags field,
such as disabling preemption or marking the end-of-context. We should
not coalesce consecutive requests if they have differing instructions
as we only inspect the last active request in a context. Thus if we
allow a later request to be merged into the same execution context, it
will mask any of the earlier flags.

References: 2a98f4e65bba ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption 
on a request")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 9666d51b7e97..7b43c1852776 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,9 @@ static bool can_merge_rq(const struct i915_request *prev,
        if (i915_request_completed(next))
                return true;
 
+       if (unlikely(prev->flags ^ next->flags) & I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT)
+               return false;
+
        if (!can_merge_ctx(prev->hw_context, next->hw_context))
                return false;
 
-- 
2.23.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to