On 11/10/2019 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
Only the requests that have not completed do we want to change the
status of to signal the -EIO when cancelling the inflight set of requests
upon wedging.
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index b00499cc7586..1f4772329021 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -247,8 +247,12 @@ static void __context_pin_release(struct intel_context *ce)
static void mark_eio(struct i915_request *rq)
{
- if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
- dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
+ if (i915_request_completed(rq))
+ return;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_signaled(rq));
+
+ dma_fence_set_error(&rq->fence, -EIO);
i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
}
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
