Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-11-11 09:53:08) > The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding > preemption not being considered as privileged op. > > Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]> > Fixes: 9cd20ef7803c ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered > ctx")
Oops, that'll teach me for not looking at the result more carefully. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
