Perform the i2c bus/adapter lookup from ACPI Namespace only if
ACPI is enabled in the kernel config. If ACPI is not enabled or if
the lookup fails, we'll fallback to using the VBT for identiying
the i2c bus.
v2: Clearly identify the commit this patch is fixing (Jani)
v3: Remove the i2c_bus_num >= 0 check from the adapter lookup function
as this would prevent ACPI bus number override. This check was mainly
there to return early if the bus number has already been found but we
anyway return in the next line if the slave address does not match.
Fixes: 8cbf89db2941 ("drm/i915/dsi: Parse the I2C element from the VBT MIPI
sequence block (v3)")
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Cc: Nabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.ma...@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
Cc: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paa...@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Cc: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiao...@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasire...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 50 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
index 89fb0d90b694..04f953ba8f00 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
@@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_gpio(struct intel_dsi
*intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
return data;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
static int i2c_adapter_lookup(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
{
struct i2c_adapter_lookup *lookup = data;
@@ -393,8 +394,7 @@ static int i2c_adapter_lookup(struct acpi_resource *ares,
void *data)
acpi_handle adapter_handle;
acpi_status status;
- if (intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num >= 0 ||
- !i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb))
+ if (!i2c_acpi_get_i2c_resource(ares, &sb))
return 1;
if (lookup->slave_addr != sb->slave_address)
@@ -413,14 +413,41 @@ static int i2c_adapter_lookup(struct acpi_resource *ares,
void *data)
return 1;
}
-static const u8 *mipi_exec_i2c(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
+static void i2c_acpi_find_adapter(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
+ const u16 slave_addr)
{
struct drm_device *drm_dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
struct device *dev = &drm_dev->pdev->dev;
- struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev;
struct list_head resource_list;
struct i2c_adapter_lookup lookup;
+
+ acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
+ if (acpi_dev) {
+ memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
+ lookup.slave_addr = slave_addr;
+ lookup.intel_dsi = intel_dsi;
+ lookup.dev_handle = acpi_device_handle(acpi_dev);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
+ acpi_dev_get_resources(acpi_dev, &resource_list,
+ i2c_adapter_lookup,
+ &lookup);
+ acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
+ }
+}
+#else
+static inline void i2c_acpi_find_adapter(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi,
+ const u16 slave_addr)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
+static const u8 *mipi_exec_i2c(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
+{
+ struct drm_device *drm_dev = intel_dsi->base.base.dev;
+ struct device *dev = &drm_dev->pdev->dev;
+ struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
struct i2c_msg msg;
int ret;
u8 vbt_i2c_bus_num = *(data + 2);
@@ -431,20 +458,7 @@ static const u8 *mipi_exec_i2c(struct intel_dsi
*intel_dsi, const u8 *data)
if (intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num < 0) {
intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num = vbt_i2c_bus_num;
-
- acpi_dev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
- if (acpi_dev) {
- memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
- lookup.slave_addr = slave_addr;
- lookup.intel_dsi = intel_dsi;
- lookup.dev_handle = acpi_device_handle(acpi_dev);
-
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
- acpi_dev_get_resources(acpi_dev, &resource_list,
- i2c_adapter_lookup,
- &lookup);
- acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
- }
+ i2c_acpi_find_adapter(intel_dsi, slave_addr);
}
adapter = i2c_get_adapter(intel_dsi->i2c_bus_num);
--
2.21.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
