From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Eliminate the weird inverted logic from the rps new_delay comparison.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index 611da3a..62f8b2d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -707,8 +707,8 @@ static void gen6_pm_rps_work(struct work_struct *work) /* sysfs frequency interfaces may have snuck in while servicing the * interrupt */ - if (!(new_delay > dev_priv->rps.max_delay || - new_delay < dev_priv->rps.min_delay)) { + if (new_delay >= dev_priv->rps.min_delay && + new_delay <= dev_priv->rps.max_delay) { if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)) valleyview_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, new_delay); else -- 1.8.1.5 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
