This workaround appears under two different numbers (and with somewhat
confused stepping applicability on ICL). Ultimately it appears we
should just implement this for all stepping of ICL and EHL.
Note that this is identical to Wa_1407928979:tgl that already exists in
our driver too...yet another number referencing the same actual
workaround.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index cbfc8d5ebb3e..5176ad1a3976 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -1487,6 +1487,14 @@ rcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
struct i915_wa_list *wal)
wa_write_or(wal,
SUBSLICE_UNIT_LEVEL_CLKGATE,
GWUNIT_CLKGATE_DIS);
+
+ /*
+ * Wa_1408767742:icl[a2..forever],ehl[all]
+ * Wa_1605460711:icl[a0..c0]
+ */
+ wa_write_or(wal,
+ GEN7_FF_THREAD_MODE,
+ GEN12_FF_TESSELATION_DOP_GATE_DISABLE);
}
if (IS_GEN_RANGE(i915, 9, 12)) {
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
