On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:07:44PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, "Bharadiya,Pankaj" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 02:48:04PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Convert all the DRM_* logging macros to the struct drm_device based
> >> macros to provide device specific logging.
> >> 
> >> No functional changes.
> >> 
> >> Generated using the following semantic patch, originally written by
> >> Wambui Karuga <[email protected]>, with manual fixups on top:
> >> 
> >> @@
> >> identifier fn, T;
> >> @@
> >> 
> >> fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) {
> >> <+...
> >> (
> >> -DRM_INFO(
> >> +drm_info(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_NOTE(
> >> +drm_notice(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_ERROR(
> >> +drm_err(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_WARN(
> >> +drm_warn(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
> >> +drm_dbg(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
> >> +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
> >> +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> )
> >> ...+>
> >> }
> >> 
> >> @@
> >> identifier fn, T;
> >> @@
> >> 
> >> fn(...) {
> >> ...
> >> struct drm_i915_private *T = ...;
> >> <+...
> >> (
> >> -DRM_INFO(
> >> +drm_info(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_NOTE(
> >> +drm_notice(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_ERROR(
> >> +drm_err(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_WARN(
> >> +drm_warn(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
> >> +drm_dbg(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_DEBUG_KMS(
> >> +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> |
> >> -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC(
> >> +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm,
> >> ...)
> >> )
> >> ...+>
> >> }
> >> 
> >> Cc: Wambui Karuga <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> >> index 276f43870802..a080a623bed6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> >> @@ -684,9 +684,10 @@ static void
> >>  intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(const struct drm_connector_state 
> >> *conn_state, u32 level)
> >>  {
> >>    struct intel_connector *connector = 
> >> to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> >> +  struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> >
> > This addition does not match with the cocci script mentioned in the
> > commit description.
> > Are you sure same script is used to generate this patch?
> 
> I've made some manual changes, such as adding locals first and then
> running the script.

Adding new i915 variable seems to be redundant here since we can 
directly use "connector->base.dev" for getting struct drm_device
pointer.

Thanks,
Pankaj

> 
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> >
> >>    struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
> >>  
> >> -  DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("set backlight PWM = %d\n", level);
> >> +  drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "set backlight PWM = %d\n", level);
> >>  
> >>    level = intel_panel_compute_brightness(connector, level);
> >>    panel->backlight.set(conn_state, level);
> >> @@ -867,8 +868,8 @@ void intel_panel_disable_backlight(const struct 
> >> drm_connector_state *old_conn_st
> >>     * another client is not activated.
> >>     */
> >>    if (dev_priv->drm.switch_power_state == DRM_SWITCH_POWER_CHANGING) {
> >> -          drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm,
> >> -                  "Skipping backlight disable on vga switch\n");
> >> +          drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> >> +                      "Skipping backlight disable on vga switch\n");
> >>            return;
> >>    }
> >>  
> >> @@ -1244,7 +1245,7 @@ static u32 intel_panel_get_backlight(struct 
> >> intel_connector *connector)
> >>  
> >>    mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->backlight_lock);
> >>  
> >> -  drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm, "get backlight PWM = %d\n", val);
> >> +  drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "get backlight PWM = %d\n", val);
> >>    return val;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> @@ -1335,6 +1336,7 @@ static const struct backlight_ops 
> >> intel_backlight_device_ops = {
> >>  
> >>  int intel_backlight_device_register(struct intel_connector *connector)
> >>  {
> >> +  struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
> >
> > Same as above.
> >
> >>    struct intel_panel *panel = &connector->panel;
> >>    struct backlight_properties props;
> >>  
> >> @@ -1374,14 +1376,15 @@ int intel_backlight_device_register(struct 
> >> intel_connector *connector)
> >>                                      &intel_backlight_device_ops, &props);
> >>  
> >>    if (IS_ERR(panel->backlight.device)) {
> >> -          DRM_ERROR("Failed to register backlight: %ld\n",
> >> -                    PTR_ERR(panel->backlight.device));
> >> +          drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to register backlight: %ld\n",
> >> +                  PTR_ERR(panel->backlight.device));
> >>            panel->backlight.device = NULL;
> >>            return -ENODEV;
> >>    }
> >>  
> >> -  DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Connector %s backlight sysfs interface registered\n",
> >> -                connector->base.name);
> >> +  drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> >> +              "Connector %s backlight sysfs interface registered\n",
> >> +              connector->base.name);
> >>  
> >>    return 0;
> >>  }
> >> -- 
> >> 2.20.1
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Intel-gfx mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to