It's been a while since gen6_rps_boost() [that only worked on gen6+] was
replaced by intel_rps_boost() that understood itself when rps was
active. Since the intel_rps_boost() is gen-agnostic, just call it.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 679a915e9a63..e48daeef6882 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -1823,11 +1823,8 @@ long i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq,
         * but at a cost of spending more power processing the workload
         * (bad for battery).
         */
-       if (flags & I915_WAIT_PRIORITY) {
-               if (!i915_request_started(rq) &&
-                   INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 6)
-                       intel_rps_boost(rq);
-       }
+       if (flags & I915_WAIT_PRIORITY && !i915_request_started(rq))
+               intel_rps_boost(rq);
 
        wait.tsk = current;
        if (dma_fence_add_callback(&rq->fence, &wait.cb, request_wait_wake))
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to