Quoting Matthew Auld (2020-11-05 15:40:20)
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 15:39, Matthew Auld
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 10:11, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > More the specialised interation with the physical GEM object from the
> >
> > Move                           interaction
> >
> > > pread/pwrite ioctl handler into the phys backend.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
> 
> Does  this need  Fixes btw?

I was thinking so long as we land before dg1 it would be fine. If we did
a fake lmem with no aperture, we would have problems already. But there's
no user exposure, so no pressing need for cc:stable.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to