Checkpatch spotted a few repeated words in the comment, genuine
mistakes.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c                 | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset_types.h          | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c          | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c         | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index 3e680bfa9d13..304d4b8e08e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ static void execlists_release(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine)
 static void
 logical_ring_default_vfuncs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
-       /* Default vfuncs which can be overriden by each engine. */
+       /* Default vfuncs which can be overridden by each engine. */
 
        engine->resume = execlists_resume;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index eece0844fbe9..dac07d66f658 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int i915_ggtt_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 }
 
 /*
- * Certain Gen5 chipsets require require idling the GPU before
+ * Certain Gen5 chipsets require idling the GPU before
  * unmapping anything from the GTT when VT-d is enabled.
  */
 static bool needs_idle_maps(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset_types.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset_types.h
index add6b86d9d03..9312b29f5a97 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset_types.h
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct intel_reset {
         *
         * #I915_WEDGED_ON_INIT - If we fail to initialize the GPU we can no
         * longer use the GPU - similar to #I915_WEDGED bit. The difference in
-        * in the way we're handling "forced" unwedged (e.g. through debugfs),
+        * the way we're handling "forced" unwedged (e.g. through debugfs),
         * which is not allowed in case we failed to initialize.
         *
         * #I915_WEDGED_ON_FINI - Similar to #I915_WEDGED_ON_INIT, except we
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
index e51e6977016a..8abfd6ad9718 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static void gen8_ctx_workarounds_init(struct 
intel_engine_cs *engine,
                     PARTIAL_INSTRUCTION_SHOOTDOWN_DISABLE);
 
        /* Use Force Non-Coherent whenever executing a 3D context. This is a
-        * workaround for for a possible hang in the unlikely event a TLB
+        * workaround for a possible hang in the unlikely event a TLB
         * invalidation occurs during a PSD flush.
         */
        /* WaForceEnableNonCoherent:bdw,chv */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
index 4f2853a83075..6cfa9a89d891 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
@@ -2864,7 +2864,7 @@ static int __live_preempt_ring(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine,
        err = wait_for_submit(engine, rq, HZ / 2);
        i915_request_put(rq);
        if (err) {
-               pr_err("%s: preemption request was not submited\n",
+               pr_err("%s: preemption request was not submitted\n",
                       engine->name);
                err = -ETIME;
        }
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to