On Fri, 03 Dec 2021, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:55:43AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> I think an insteresting question is, with all the debugfs stuff being >> static in intel_fbc.c, is the compiler actually smart enough to optimize >> the static code and data away when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n, even without >> #ifdefs? Or is that something you're already claiming above? > > Yes it all disappeared from the binary when I tried it. > Only thing left was an empty intel_fbc_debugfs_register().
\o/ -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
