On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 07:42:50PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
> 
> Extract the data rate calculation loop out from
> intel_bw_atomic_check() to make it a bit less confusing.
> 
> Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <[email protected]>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 63 +++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index fa03f0935b6d..963b99d3557c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -835,31 +835,12 @@ static u16 icl_qgv_points_mask(struct drm_i915_private 
> *i915)
>       return mask;
>  }
>  
> -int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +static int intel_bw_check_data_rate(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  {
> -     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> -     struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
> -     struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;
> -     const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;
> -     unsigned int data_rate;
> -     unsigned int num_active_planes;
> +     struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +     const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
>       struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> -     int i, ret;
> -     u32 allowed_points = 0;
> -     unsigned int max_bw_point = 0, max_bw = 0;
> -     unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
> -     unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_psf_gv_points;
> -
> -     /* FIXME earlier gens need some checks too */
> -     if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11)
> -             return 0;
> -
> -     /*
> -      * If we already have the bw state then recompute everything
> -      * even if pipe data_rate / active_planes didn't change.
> -      * Other things (such as SAGV) may have changed.
> -      */
> -     new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
> +     int i;
>  
>       for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
>                                           new_crtc_state, i) {
> @@ -871,6 +852,7 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
>                       intel_bw_crtc_num_active_planes(old_crtc_state);
>               unsigned int new_active_planes =
>                       intel_bw_crtc_num_active_planes(new_crtc_state);
> +             struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
>  
>               /*
>                * Avoid locking the bw state when
> @@ -887,13 +869,42 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
>               new_bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe] = new_data_rate;
>               new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe] = new_active_planes;
>  
> -             drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> -                         "pipe %c data rate %u num active planes %u\n",
> -                         pipe_name(crtc->pipe),
> +             drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> +                         "[CRTC:%d:%s] data rate %u num active planes %u\n",
> +                         crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name,
>                           new_bw_state->data_rate[crtc->pipe],
>                           new_bw_state->num_active_planes[crtc->pipe]);
>       }
>  
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> +     const struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state;
> +     struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state;
> +     unsigned int data_rate;
> +     unsigned int num_active_planes;
> +     int i, ret;
> +     u32 allowed_points = 0;
> +     unsigned int max_bw_point = 0, max_bw = 0;
> +     unsigned int num_qgv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_qgv_points;
> +     unsigned int num_psf_gv_points = dev_priv->max_bw[0].num_psf_gv_points;
> +
> +     /* FIXME earlier gens need some checks too */
> +     if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 11)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     ret = intel_bw_check_data_rate(state);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * If we don't have a bw_state by now then none of the
> +      * inputs to the QGV mask computation may have changed.
> +      */
> +     new_bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_bw_state(state);
>       if (!new_bw_state)
>               return 0;
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Reply via email to