On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:53:19 +0300
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Add trace points for observing the atomic pipe update mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 77
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 6 +++
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> index 6e580c9..9ffb232 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #include <drm/drmP.h>
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> +#include "intel_drv.h"
> #include "intel_ringbuffer.h"
>
> #undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> @@ -14,6 +15,82 @@
> #define TRACE_SYSTEM_STRING __stringify(TRACE_SYSTEM)
> #define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE i915_trace
>
> +/* pipe updates */
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_start,
> + TP_PROTO(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u32 min, u32 max),
> + TP_ARGS(crtc, min, max),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(enum pipe, pipe)
> + __field(u32, frame)
> + __field(u32, scanline)
> + __field(u32, min)
> + __field(u32, max)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
> + __entry->frame =
> crtc->dev->driver->get_vblank_counter(crtc->dev,
> +
> to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe);
> + __entry->scanline = i915_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
> + __entry->min = min;
> + __entry->max = max;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("pipe %c, frame=%u, scanline=%u, min=%u, max=%u",
> + pipe_name(__entry->pipe), __entry->frame,
> + __entry->scanline, __entry->min, __entry->max)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_vblank_evaded,
> + TP_PROTO(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u32 min, u32 max),
> + TP_ARGS(crtc, min, max),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(enum pipe, pipe)
> + __field(u32, frame)
> + __field(u32, scanline)
> + __field(u32, min)
> + __field(u32, max)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
> + __entry->frame =
> crtc->dev->driver->get_vblank_counter(crtc->dev,
> +
> to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe);
> + __entry->scanline = i915_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
> + __entry->min = min;
> + __entry->max = max;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("pipe %c, frame=%u, scanline=%u, min=%u, max=%u",
> + pipe_name(__entry->pipe), __entry->frame,
> + __entry->scanline, __entry->min, __entry->max)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(i915_pipe_update_end,
> + TP_PROTO(struct drm_crtc *crtc),
> + TP_ARGS(crtc),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(enum pipe, pipe)
> + __field(u32, frame)
> + __field(u32, scanline)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
> + __entry->frame =
> crtc->dev->driver->get_vblank_counter(crtc->dev,
> +
> to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe);
> + __entry->scanline = i915_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("pipe %c, frame=%u, scanline=%u",
> + pipe_name(__entry->pipe), __entry->frame,
> + __entry->scanline)
> +);
> +
> /* object tracking */
>
> TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_object_create,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> index f871b8f..874ffc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static void intel_pipe_update_start(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>
> local_irq_disable();
>
> + trace_i915_pipe_update_start(crtc, min, max);
> +
> intel_crtc->vbl_received = false;
> scanline = i915_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
>
> @@ -78,10 +80,14 @@ static void intel_pipe_update_start(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> }
>
> drm_vblank_put(dev, pipe);
> +
> + trace_i915_pipe_update_vblank_evaded(crtc, min, max);
> }
>
> static void intel_pipe_update_end(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> {
> + trace_i915_pipe_update_end(crtc);
> +
> local_irq_enable();
> }
>
Not sure about the "vblank_evaded" one. Seems like you'd have enough
info from the start/end to figure out if you missed, since you'd have
the time and vblank seqno, right? But that's really no biggie.
It does make me think we should start documenting these events though...
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
