> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> Chaitanya Kumar Borah
> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2023 9:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Roper, Matthew D <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display: Set correct voltage level 
> for 480MHz CDCLK
> 
> According to Bspec, the voltage level for 480MHz is to be set as 1 instead of 
> 2.
> 
> BSpec: 49208
> 
> Fixes: 06f1b06dc5b7 ("drm/i915/display: Add 480 MHz CDCLK steps for RPL-U")
> 
> v2: rebase
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 6bed75f1541a..1a5268e3d0a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1453,6 +1453,18 @@ static u8 tgl_calc_voltage_level(int cdclk)
>               return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static u8 rplu_calc_voltage_level(int cdclk) {
> +     if (cdclk > 556800)
> +             return 3;
> +     else if (cdclk > 480000)
> +             return 2;
> +     else if (cdclk > 312000)
> +             return 1;
> +     else
> +             return 0;
> +}

The spec defines that we should use level 1 in case of SKU supports 480MHz cd 
clock and max DDI symbol clock is less than or equal to 594MHz. I didn't spot 
from the spec a scenario where we would have SKU with 480 MHz cd clock 
frequency and the DDI symbol clock rate would exceed 594MHz.

Therefore, the change looks ok to me.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <[email protected]>

> +
>  static void icl_readout_refclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>                              struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config)  { @@ 
> -3397,6 +3409,13 @@ static const struct
> intel_cdclk_funcs mtl_cdclk_funcs = {
>       .calc_voltage_level = tgl_calc_voltage_level,  };
> 
> +static const struct intel_cdclk_funcs rplu_cdclk_funcs = {
> +     .get_cdclk = bxt_get_cdclk,
> +     .set_cdclk = bxt_set_cdclk,
> +     .modeset_calc_cdclk = bxt_modeset_calc_cdclk,
> +     .calc_voltage_level = rplu_calc_voltage_level, };
> +
>  static const struct intel_cdclk_funcs tgl_cdclk_funcs = {
>       .get_cdclk = bxt_get_cdclk,
>       .set_cdclk = bxt_set_cdclk,
> @@ -3539,14 +3558,17 @@ void intel_init_cdclk_hooks(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv)
>               dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &tgl_cdclk_funcs;
>               dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = dg2_cdclk_table;
>       } else if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv)) {
> -             dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &tgl_cdclk_funcs;
>               /* Wa_22011320316:adl-p[a0] */
> -             if (IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> +             if (IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) {
>                       dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = adlp_a_step_cdclk_table;
> -             else if (IS_ADLP_RPLU(dev_priv))
> +                     dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &tgl_cdclk_funcs;
> +             } else if (IS_ADLP_RPLU(dev_priv)) {
>                       dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = rplu_cdclk_table;
> -             else
> +                     dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &rplu_cdclk_funcs;
> +             } else {
>                       dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = adlp_cdclk_table;
> +                     dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &tgl_cdclk_funcs;
> +             }
>       } else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
>               dev_priv->display.funcs.cdclk = &tgl_cdclk_funcs;
>               dev_priv->display.cdclk.table = rkl_cdclk_table;
> --
> 2.25.1

Reply via email to