Hi Matt,
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:07:22PM -0700, Matt Atwood wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:48:33PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:35:47PM -0700, Matt Atwood wrote:
> > > Set I915_PMU_MAX_GTS to value in I915_MAX_GT, theres no reason for these
> > > values to be different.
> > >
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > > index 33d80fbaab8b..aa929d8c224a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.h
> > > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ enum {
> > > __I915_NUM_PMU_SAMPLERS
> > > };
> > >
> > > -#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS 2
> > > +#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS 4
> >
> > right! Why not having
> >
> > #define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS I915_MAX_GT
> >
> > or... why having I915_PMU_MAX_GTS at all?
> Originally I went the route of s/I915_PMU_MAX_GTS/I915_MAX_GT/g.
> However, this introduces many changes to where you then move
> I915_MAX_GT to and #include blocks in fiels that require these values.
> In the end I decided it was better to keep define and just change the
> value.
OK, makes sense, then how about
#define I915_PMU_MAX_GTS I915_MAX_GT
i915_pmu.h has visibility on I915_MAX_GT.
Andi
> >
> > Andi
> >
> > > /*
> > > * How many different events we track in the global PMU mask.
> > > --
> > > 2.40.0
> MattA
