On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 01:55:47PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 01:41:08PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> The WARN is a bit too verbose, make it a DRM_INFO that gets printed
> >> once.
> >> 
> >> While at it, fix the typo in DSLP.
> >> 
> >> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c |    6 +++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> >> index 46d288055345..0fae017c4c7b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c
> >> @@ -263,7 +263,11 @@ static int swsci(struct drm_device *dev, u32 
> >> function, u32 parm, u32 *parm_out)
> >>            dslp = 50;
> >>    } else if (dslp > 1500) {
> >>            /* Hey bios, trust must be earned. */
> >> -          WARN_ONCE(1, "excessive driver sleep timeout (DSPL) %u\n", 
> >> dslp);
> >> +          static bool warned;
> >> +          if (!warned) {
> >> +                  DRM_INFO("excessive driver sleep timeout (DSLP) %u\n", 
> >> dslp);
> >
> > DRM_INFO("ACPI BIOS requests an excessive sleep of %d ms, using %d 
> > instead\n", dslp, MAX_DSLP);
> 
> You're just saying that because I didn't dare to write the new value
> back to opregion! :p

I'm just trying to clarify that it is not our fault we want to sleep for
several seconds during startup, but the manufacturer...

But yes, you are a coward. ;-)
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to