-----Original Message-----
From: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 6:04 AM
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Cc: Cavitt, Jonathan <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; Gupta, saurabhg <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; Iddamsetty, Aravind 
<[email protected]>; Yang, Fei <[email protected]>; Harrison, John 
C <[email protected]>; Das, Nirmoy <[email protected]>; Krzysztofik, 
Janusz <[email protected]>; Roper, Matthew D 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] drm/i915/gt: Increase sleep in gt_tlb selftest 
sanitycheck
> 
> Hi Tvrtko,
> 
> > On 09/10/2023 18:29, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> > > For the gt_tlb live selftest, when operating on the GSC engine,
> > > increase the timeout from 10 ms to 200 ms because the GSC
> > > engine is a bit slower than the rest.
> > 
> > And others from 10ms to 20ms. By accident or deliberate?
> 
> yes, accident :-)


I should've clarified in the patch that this was to resolve a CHECKPATCH error:
-:29: WARNING:MSLEEP: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see 
Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
But I wasn't sure if we were allowed to talk about such things on the mailing 
list.
-Jonathan Cavitt


> 
> Andi
> 
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_tlb.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_tlb.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_tlb.c
> > > index 7e41f69fc818f..24beb94aa7a37 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_tlb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_tlb.c
> > > @@ -136,8 +136,15 @@ pte_tlbinv(struct intel_context *ce,
> > >           i915_request_get(rq);
> > >           i915_request_add(rq);
> > > - /* Short sleep to sanitycheck the batch is spinning before we begin */
> > > - msleep(10);
> > > + /*
> > > +  * Short sleep to sanitycheck the batch is spinning before we begin.
> > > +  * FIXME: Why is GSC so slow?
> > > +  */
> > > + if (ce->engine->class == OTHER_CLASS)
> > > +         msleep(200);
> > > + else
> > > +         msleep(20);
> > > +
> > >           if (va == vb) {
> > >                   if (!i915_request_completed(rq)) {
> > >                           pr_err("%s(%s): Semaphore sanitycheck failed 
> > > %llx, with alignment %llx, using PTE size %x (phys %x, sg %x)\n",
> 

Reply via email to