As a preparation for Xe we want to remove all i915_gem_object details away
from frontbuffer tacking code. Due to this move releasing gem object
reference to i915_gem_object_set_frontbuffer.

Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c       | 2 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
index ec46716b2f49..2ea37c0414a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c
@@ -265,8 +265,6 @@ static void frontbuffer_release(struct kref *ref)
        spin_unlock(&intel_bo_to_i915(obj)->display.fb_tracking.lock);
 
        i915_active_fini(&front->write);
-
-       i915_gem_object_put(obj);
        kfree_rcu(front, rcu);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.h
index e5e870b6f186..9fbf14867a2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.h
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ i915_gem_object_set_frontbuffer(struct drm_i915_gem_object 
*obj,
 
        if (!front) {
                RCU_INIT_POINTER(obj->frontbuffer, NULL);
+               drm_gem_object_put(intel_bo_to_drm_bo(obj));
        } else if (rcu_access_pointer(obj->frontbuffer)) {
                cur = rcu_dereference_protected(obj->frontbuffer, true);
                kref_get(&cur->ref);
-- 
2.34.1

Reply via email to