Hi,

On 11/2/23 15:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 11:20:23AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 11/1/23 10:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> On 10/31/23 17:07, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> On 10/24/23 18:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 06:57:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> Note you still need the first part of my patch which is
>> an unrelated bugfix:
>>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
>> @@ -219,8 +219,7 @@ static void soc_exec_gpio(struct intel_connector 
>> *connector, const char *con_id,
>>      } else {
>>              gpio_desc = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev_priv->drm.dev,
>>                                               con_id, gpio_index,
>> -                                             value ? GPIOD_OUT_LOW :
>> -                                             GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>> +                                             value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : 
>> GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>>              if (IS_ERR(gpio_desc)) {
>>                      drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
>>                              "GPIO index %u request failed (%pe)\n",
> 
> Can you attach or send a formal submission, so I can incorporate it into one
> (v3) series among other changes?

I thought this fixed new code in your series and it is a trivial fix,
so my idea was that you would just fold the fix into the patch
introducing the code.

But I see now that this is existing code from bxt_exec_gpio().

A formal fix to use as a prep patch for your series is now attached,
this is based on top of drm-misc-next (I guess drm-intel-next
would be better but I had an up2date drm-misc-next handy).

Regards,

Hans

From c300ed0e09d1fd14bf966dc172c6db54b888faf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:49:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/dsi: Fix wrong initial value for GPIOs in
 bxt_exec_gpio()

Fix wrong initial value for GPIOs in bxt_exec_gpio().

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
index e56ec3f2d84a..0587cbc2e584 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
@@ -356,9 +356,7 @@ static void bxt_exec_gpio(struct intel_connector *connector,
 	if (!gpio_desc) {
 		gpio_desc = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev_priv->drm.dev,
 						 NULL, gpio_index,
-						 value ? GPIOD_OUT_LOW :
-						 GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
-
+						 value ? GPIOD_OUT_HIGH : GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
 		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(gpio_desc)) {
 			drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,
 				"GPIO index %u request failed (%ld)\n",
-- 
2.41.0

Reply via email to